Investigating Mastercard's Standing In Financial Services Industry Compared To Competitors
Portfolio Pulse from Benzinga Insights
The article provides a comprehensive analysis of Mastercard (NYSE:MA) compared to its competitors in the Financial Services industry. Key financial metrics such as P/E, P/B, P/S, ROE, EBITDA, and revenue growth are evaluated. Mastercard shows strong profitability and efficient operations but has lower revenue growth compared to the industry average.
July 25, 2024 | 3:00 pm
News sentiment analysis
Sort by:
Descending
POSITIVE IMPACT
Mastercard demonstrates strong profitability and efficient operations with a high ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit. However, its revenue growth is lower than the industry average, which may raise concerns about future performance.
Mastercard's strong financial metrics such as high ROE, EBITDA, and gross profit indicate robust profitability and efficient operations. However, the lower revenue growth compared to the industry average may concern investors about future performance. Overall, the positive financial health and profitability metrics are likely to have a positive short-term impact on the stock price.
CONFIDENCE 90
IMPORTANCE 90
RELEVANCE 100
POSITIVE IMPACT
Visa shows a lower P/E ratio and higher EBITDA compared to Mastercard, indicating strong profitability. However, its ROE is significantly lower, suggesting less efficient use of equity.
Visa's lower P/E ratio and higher EBITDA compared to Mastercard indicate strong profitability. However, the significantly lower ROE suggests less efficient use of equity. The overall positive financial health is likely to have a positive short-term impact on the stock price.
CONFIDENCE 85
IMPORTANCE 80
RELEVANCE 80
NEUTRAL IMPACT
Fiserv has a lower P/E and P/B ratio compared to Mastercard, indicating potential undervaluation. However, its ROE and EBITDA are significantly lower, suggesting less profitability and efficiency.
Fiserv's lower P/E and P/B ratios compared to Mastercard indicate potential undervaluation. However, the significantly lower ROE and EBITDA suggest less profitability and efficiency. The mixed financial metrics are likely to have a neutral short-term impact on the stock price.
CONFIDENCE 80
IMPORTANCE 70
RELEVANCE 70
NEUTRAL IMPACT
PayPal has a significantly lower P/E and P/B ratio compared to Mastercard, indicating potential undervaluation. However, its ROE and EBITDA are also lower, suggesting less profitability and efficiency.
PayPal's significantly lower P/E and P/B ratios compared to Mastercard indicate potential undervaluation. However, the lower ROE and EBITDA suggest less profitability and efficiency. The mixed financial metrics are likely to have a neutral short-term impact on the stock price.
CONFIDENCE 80
IMPORTANCE 70
RELEVANCE 70
NEGATIVE IMPACT
Fidelity National Information Services has a significantly higher P/E ratio compared to Mastercard, indicating potential overvaluation. Its ROE and EBITDA are also lower, suggesting less profitability and efficiency.
Fidelity National Information Services' significantly higher P/E ratio compared to Mastercard indicates potential overvaluation. The lower ROE and EBITDA suggest less profitability and efficiency. The negative financial metrics are likely to have a negative short-term impact on the stock price.
CONFIDENCE 80
IMPORTANCE 70
RELEVANCE 70