Tesla Scorches Short Sellers With $12.6B Burn In 2023: A Volatile Year For Bears
Portfolio Pulse from Shanthi Rexaline
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has been the most shorted mega-cap stock and has caused the largest losses to short sellers in 2023, amounting to $12.6 billion. The broader S&P 500 Index's strong performance contributed to short sellers' total losses of $178 billion. Other companies like Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT), and Alphabet (GOOGL/GOOG) also saw significant short seller losses. Analysts are split on Tesla's future, with some expecting challenges and others seeing growth opportunities. Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives raised Tesla's price target to $350, suggesting a 38% upside.
December 22, 2023 | 10:32 am
News sentiment analysis
Sort by:
Descending
POSITIVE IMPACT
Apple's stock has also been tough on short sellers, with losses of $7.7 billion, reflecting its strong market performance.
Apple's inclusion in the list of companies with significant short seller losses indicates a robust stock performance, which may continue in the short term. The article does not provide specific future guidance for Apple, leading to a moderate relevance and importance score.
CONFIDENCE 75
IMPORTANCE 60
RELEVANCE 70
POSITIVE IMPACT
Alphabet has seen short sellers lose $2.2 billion, reflecting its stock's strong performance amidst market recovery.
Alphabet's mention for causing significant losses to short sellers indicates a strong stock performance, which may continue in the short term. The article does not provide specific future insights for Alphabet, leading to a moderate relevance and importance score.
CONFIDENCE 75
IMPORTANCE 60
RELEVANCE 70
POSITIVE IMPACT
Meta Platforms has seen short sellers lose $6.3 billion, suggesting a strong rebound in its stock price.
Meta Platforms' significant losses for short sellers imply a positive stock performance, which might continue in the short term. The article does not provide specific future predictions for Meta, resulting in moderate relevance and importance scores.
CONFIDENCE 75
IMPORTANCE 60
RELEVANCE 70
POSITIVE IMPACT
Microsoft has contributed to short seller losses with $5.4 billion, indicating a strong performance that may persist.
Microsoft's presence on the list of companies with substantial short seller losses suggests a positive trend in its stock price, which could remain in the short term. The article does not provide specific future outlooks for Microsoft, hence the moderate relevance and importance scores.
CONFIDENCE 75
IMPORTANCE 60
RELEVANCE 70
POSITIVE IMPACT
Nvidia is among the companies where short sellers faced significant losses, totaling $11.3 billion, indicating strong stock performance.
Nvidia's mention as one of the top companies causing losses for short sellers suggests a positive performance, which could persist short term. However, the article does not provide specific forward-looking statements for Nvidia, hence the lower relevance and importance scores compared to Tesla.
CONFIDENCE 75
IMPORTANCE 60
RELEVANCE 70
POSITIVE IMPACT
Tesla's stock has been the most shorted and has inflicted significant losses on short sellers. Analysts are divided on its future, but a recent price target increase by Wedbush suggests potential growth.
Tesla's position as the most shorted stock and the substantial losses incurred by short sellers indicate a strong performance that could continue, especially with the recent price target increase by Wedbush. However, the divided analyst opinions introduce some uncertainty, hence the confidence score is not at the maximum.
CONFIDENCE 85
IMPORTANCE 90
RELEVANCE 100
NEUTRAL IMPACT
Amazon was not featured in the top 10 list for short seller losses, which may indicate a relatively weaker performance compared to peers.
Amazon's absence from the top 10 list suggests that it may not have performed as strongly as the other mentioned companies in terms of impacting short sellers. This could imply a neutral short-term impact on the stock, reflected in the score. The relevance and importance are moderate as the article does not focus on Amazon's performance.
CONFIDENCE 70
IMPORTANCE 50
RELEVANCE 50